It seems that in the supposed twilight of their existence, the Big Three have pulled out an old shoebox of memories of the good old days; specifically the glory days of muscle cars, horsepower, and low gas prices.
Representing Ford, we have the 2010 Mustang. While there aren't any drastic differences from the past few years of the Mustang, it has seen a bit of a facelift. But aside from that, it became the first major player in this old-school muscle car frenzy back in 2005 with a desperately needed facelift. There was hardly a single redeeming trait in the third and fourth generation Mustangs which were made from 1979 to 2004. Even the second generation was disappointing, but at least it had redemption in retaining much of the sporty lines of the original. It is somewhat disappointing that the Mustang only returned to glory by returning to an old styling pattern, but then I guess that is the way of the muscle car. The basic formula is light body + the biggest, most powerful engine available. Forget about sporty handling.
Representing Chrysler LLC, we have the Dodge Challenger. This is one of the more incredible American cars I've seen, and that includes the past. I guess the Mustang wasn't as much of a surprise because it's around since 1964, and the Challenger was discontinued twice. Once in '74. Revived in '78, only to be discontinued in '84. The most recent revival will probably prove to be the more impressive. Unlike the Mustang, the Challenger pulls out all the stops. The R/T configuration comes with the Gas Guzzler Tax, and that has to speak for something. At its least, it has a 3.5L V6 putting out 250 horsepower, and at its best, the Hemi V8 putting out 376 horsepower.
Last, but certainly not least (in my opinion) is the Chevrolet Camaro, representing General Motors. In classic antiquity, the Camaro and Pontiac Trans Am were both GM muscle cars based on the same body. Because of this, I wouldn't rule out a revival of the Trans Am if GM decides it needs another muscle car. Unfortunately, both of these initially amazing cars eventually became soulless and insulting to their own heritage. Graciously, GM discontinued both in 2002. With the ever-present Mustang and the new Challenger both competing in a market somewhat below that of the Corvette, GM needed a player. More importantly, it needed something with heritage. Of course, that brings us to the Transformers movie, where Bumblebee is transformed from the 1976 Camaro to the fifth-gen concept.
So which of these great cars is the best? That of course is almost entirely opinion. Each have their ups and downs, and all three have no lack of power.
If you're the kind of person concerned about gas mileage, all 3 come with a V6 option which doesn't lack much horsepower, but does provide an economical option (the Challenger's V6 has a rating of 29 highway mpg, the same as my Grand Prix). However, if you're going to buy one of these cars, it just seems wrong to me to have anything less than eight cylinders under the hood. It's the opposite of a sleeper car. You look the part, but can't walk the walk. These cars are not meant to be practical.
In my opinion, the Mustang still lacks something, and I can't quite put my finger on it, but it just feels... cheap. Maybe even fake. Somehow you can tell that most of those body panels aren't metal, when the original was. The Challenger on the other hand is like nothing I've ever seen before. Okay, actually it's like a 1970 Dodge Challenger, which is great since that's exactly what it strives to be. Just look at the grille. It is stunning. The quality of it is similar to that of the Spyker C8 or other supercars. On the other end of the spectrum, we have the Camaro. It's grille strikes me as cheap and plastic. In fact, looking at it reminds me of a time I was playing with one of my toy cars when I was little, and a little plastic piece came off. I don't know why I remember that, but looking at the new Camaro's grille makes me think it would fall off just as easy. Fortunately though, that's where the bad taste ends. If I had to go out and buy one with my own money, it would be the Camaro, without a doubt. The Challenger almost strikes me as trying to hard. I'd love to have a poster of it on my wall, but I'm not sure I'd want to actually be seen driving it. Seems to make me think I need a cowboy hat and leather jacket. The Mustang just doesn't have the same youthfulness as the other two. I've seen too many of them being brought in by 50 year old men at my cousin's upholstery shop. Excluding the grille, the Camaro is stunning from all angles. Let me show you what I mean.
It doesn't seem like it's trying to be cool, it just is. Look at those sharp edged taillights.
If this were Top Gear, we'd have this Top Tip: If you want to buy a Camaro, buy the new one, but if you want to spend money on a Challenger or a Mustang, go with the original.
Troy